Drug testing is a common aspect in the workplace. The primary reason is to ensure that workers are not hooked on drugs that endanger their lives in the workplace. The other reason explained by payspi is that drugs affect their productivity negatively that could end up costing business thousands of dollars. Despite the testing, however, fake pee for drug tests has become a norm to beat the tests. Failing a drug test could translate to immediate firing or reprimands depending on the situation.
Drug Testing Teachers
Though it is typical for random drug tests, teachers in most states are not subjected to the procedure. However, with the growing fear among stakeholders mainly parents, it may soon be put in place. Parents worry about the welfare of their children, noting that they spend a considerable amount of time with their teachers. Teachers, on the other side, argue that random testing is a violation of their privacy.
Following a study examining professionals using illicit drug conducted in 2007 by the Department of Health and Human Services, public educators ranked 18 out of 19. The study also notes that only 4% of teachers were reported as subjects using illicit drugs. The percentage is lower compared to 14% of construction workers, noting the disparity in the work environment since construction workers handle, on a daily basis, dangerous equipment, making them more susceptible to accidents.
Following the statistics, it would not be reasonable to conduct a random drug test on teachers. Despite the low drug usage rate, the amount that would be required to finance the random tests is high as each district has a significant number of public educators. The estimated value of conducting random drug test amounts between $40 and $55 means that in every school year, every district will require thousands of dollars to finance the unprofitable venture.
Apart from the budgetary concern, there is the issue of teachers’ privacy violation. Unlike in police force or construction industry, the dangers of working in a school are limited. As such, conducting random drug tests would not be necessary for determining the safety level of teachers. The argument, supported by privacy violation concern that could expose a teacher’s prescription use or even pregnancy that has not yet been disclosed, reveals that the tests would do more harm than good.
Teachers unions continue to support teachers in the matter. There have been no significant reports showing that a teacher, under the influence of drugs, endangered children or affect their productivity. As such, the issue of implementing the drug test procedure on a broader ground will continue to be a debate that is not likely to fade away anytime soon. Some states such as Hawaii and Missouri, however, are considering drug testing their teachers.
Drug testing teachers may sound like a good idea for parents. However, the number of parents who worry that their children are in danger while in school due to illicit drugs consumption by teachers is low. School administrations are also keen on how the teachers behave given that they strive to be good role models while maintaining the reputation of the school